Part 2: Structures in the United Methodist Church Which Hinder (aka, walls to clear)
In the last part, here, I listed these 3 “walls” to clear.
1. The structure itself and how to “classify” a missional community who are able to jump geographical Conferences in a single bound!
2. Old perceptions of “what defines church”? (Don’t we all need to be a mega-church, in one location?)
3. And, the concept and theology of pastoral authority and “ordering the life” of the church.
The great thing about missional communities is that there are literally no geographical boundaries for starting, growing or cropping-up! They are an exponential growth explosion rather than a controlled small flame. They should not stay ‘where you put them.’
The idea is this. If we can plant a missional community, then members of that missional community can plant another. They don’t actually require “the pastor” to say “go forward.” But, if someone moves away to another town, they don’t leave “your church” – they expand your territory! They are resourced and connected with you so that they can start what happened where they came from! What pastor among us would like to stay connected with their parishioners – and know they are still growing in faith?
The United Methodist Church structures for mission by dividing geographical regions into "Annual Conferences" and one Bishop oversees that geographical area. But "missional communities" are not limited by geography. Can the two concepts play nicely together?
And, it means this new community, a child of your original group, could birth another community, creating a grand-child group you’ve never seen or heard about as the pastor! That grand-child group could be clear across the country.
I have discovered a huge wall within the United Methodist Church around the geography of this concept. It’s almost as big and controversial as the immigration question for the United States. At what point does the Bishop of that “clear across the country” group get to say “You’re not United Methodist”? Or, at what point does that “clear across the country” group get to say “We are United Methodist”? Hmmmm. Territories are a controlling influence within the UMC.
In the best of scenarios, the Bishop of the Annual Conference geography is Spirit minded and realizes she or he doesn’t actually establish churches, but that Jesus does and we respond in faith with a “yes.” That’s easier said than done. It’s not only bishops which struggle with how to do this honoring Jesus, it’s also the constituency, and fellow pastors, us pastors who want a bit more control, oversight, and order.
“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations . . .” At what point does the system keep the Spirit from controlling? “But Lord, we have this system for making disciples of all nations!” What if it doesn’t quite fit in our geographical system.
Or does it? Isn’t there a way for a missional community to honor the UMC system and Christ? If we believe the System is God’s choosing and we believe Christ is calling a new way of forming and defining faith communities/churches, then I would say this: [continue reading]
{ 0 comments }


